Grant Langhus
UPDATE 12/22/18: Printer finally died - yet still HIGHLY RECOMMENDED! We printed a TON - thousands - of 4x6s, many hundred 13x19, and thousands more 5x7 to 11x14s. Qty 139, 251XL cartridges over the life of the printer with zero issues. The print head failed, which is replaceable, but we decided to purchase another IP 8270 system due to volume on our original. We also have a Pro-100, but after owning the 8720 for almost 4 years, save your money...there is no discernible quality difference and the 8270 takes up far less space and doesnt weight a ton. UPDATE 2/14/16: Weve printed nearly 1200 images since purchasing the printer in Feb 2014 (majority 11x14 & 13x19) and have worked out the cost per sq inch to $0.007 to $0.009. Therefore, ink cost (purchasing 251 XL ink solely from Amazon) per 13x19 is $1.79 to $2.21. Canon Luster paper has averaged $0.69 per 13x19 sheet, for a total ink & paper cost of $2.48 to $2.90 per 13x19. Add another dollar to that for equipment wear and tear and a 13x19 is, worst-case, under $4.00. For every 1 PGBK cartridge, we go through: 3 BK, 8 GY, 6 C, 7 M, and 12 Y. Pros : Excellent print quality, Affordable, Color Management, Easy to Use, Large-format, Low Cost Per Square Inch, Speed Average To Fast, Color ink water resistant on Canon photo papers. Cons: Plastic Paper Guides/Flaps. Best Uses: Prosumer AND Professional Prints Describe Yourself : Semi-pro Photographer Was this a gift? No (Purchased from B&H; Ink & Paper from Amazon) PRINTER PURPOSE: Showcase amateur nature & landscape photography in our own home, and sell prints in limited quantities locally. CAMERAS: Canon T1i; T5i; 70D, 7D MkII LENSES: Canon 100-400 II, 200 f/2.8 IS II, 10-22 & 17-85 EF-S, 50mm 1.4 & 1.8, 85mm 1.8, 400 f/2.8 Mk I. REVIEW: Overall, were very satisfied with this printer. We are a prosumer customer having owned numerous photo-quality HP printers/MFPs over the past 13 years. Speed is average to fast. Quality is excellent - although I suspect high-quality papers contribute a lot (the Canon photo papers mentioned below have been excellent). Ink droplets are very minute, the smallest Ive seen in any system Ive owned. Color blending is also excellent - see the example Bluebird picture. Grayscale images are also excellent - much better than HP systems only utilizing a single black cartridge. Interestingly enough, we ran water over the alignment page, where the black bled slightly; blue did not. We then ran water over both a full-color and grayscale image and neither bled at all, nor were streaks/issues apparent after the print dried. We did notice the images printed a bit warm; again, see the example photos. Although this is nice in many photos, it posed a problem when we tried to print pictures of fall foliage - easy to correct in Photoshop, however. B&W images printed slightly dark - but not so dark that detail was lost like other systems Ive owned. Two thoughts - One, the wireless was a bit of a hassle, but due to our set-up and print volume, we ultimately settled for USB connectivity. Second, lots of plastic like most products these days, which Im not opposed to if done appropriately. The chassis is strong and built well, but the extendable paper guides/flaps for holding sheets as they are fed and exit could be built better. With dust concerns and opening/closing the system, I wonder how long theyll last. UPDATE 2/14/16: After two years, no issues. PAPER TYPES TESTED: Canon Pro Platinum 8.5x11, Luster 13x19, Plus Gloss II 4x6. UPDATE 2/14/16: Just tried the Moab Slickrock 300 Metallic paper, and wow - its just like ordering Metallic prints from a photo lab. The paper is very, very sensitive and chips/scratches easily, but the quality is tremendous for DIY at home. Put the print behind glass after it has a day or two to breathe to protect it. 2018 Update - weve also put a few rolls of Epson canvas through the printer (then stretched the canvas ourselves) TIP - make sure the canvas is perfectly flat, no roll, at the edges or the print head rubs. But, if done carefully, it works, and the results are excellent! https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004MT0RKS/ COMPUTER & POST-PROCESSING: Windows 7/8.1 (now Win 10) systems using USB, printing from both Photoshop & Lightroom CC. TESTING SCENARIO In general, we post-process lightly, attempting to retain a realistic photo and HDR only when required. After the Canon iP8720 arrived from B&H in Feb 2014, we printed a wide variety of color and grayscale shots that had been post-processed, on three types of Canon paper. PRODUCT PHOTOS were shot with a T1i, 10-22, no post-processing (see picture gallery/product photos gallery for our photos, located at top-most left side of page). PRINTED PHOTOS used to test the product were lightning in Florida (B&W); Flowers from Iowa; Badlands National Park, Fall colors from Iowa/Wisconsin, and mountain bluebird from Yellowstone National Park. Additional photos for testing, not shown, include Yosemite National Park, Death Valley National Park, and Grand Teton National Park.
