Boston

Home/Catalog/Camera & Photo/Lenses/Sony SEL1670Z Vario-Tessar T E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS

Sony SEL1670Z Vario-Tessar T E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS

Write a review

CODE:

B00ENZRPG0

In stock

Add to wish list

Vendor: Adorama

Serving customers for more than 35 years, Adorama has grown from its flagship NYC stor...

Ask a question

Delivery

DHL express - Fast

1 day, Door-to-Door, Courier Delivered

from 26$

Fedex express - International shipments

2-3 days, Tracking available

from 14$

Pickup at your own expense

Tomorrow from 09:00 to 20:00, Store location

Free

Payment options

Cash, bank card, credit/installment payments, cashless payment for legal entities

More details

Warranty and returns

Exchange/return of products of proper quality within 14 days Official manufacturer's warranty: 12 months

More details

Description
Reviews 20

This fits your .

Make sure this fits by entering your model number. Carl Zeiss mid-range zoom lens; Compatible with E-mount Full Frame cameras and E-mount APS-C cameras Minimum Focus Distance : 1.15 ft (0.35 m), Maximum Magnification ratio : 0.23x, Focal Length : 16-70 mm High lens technology in a compact body. Filter Diameter (mm) - 55 mm Optical Steady Shot image stabilization. Zeiss T anti-reflective coating When using a flash, always remove the lens hood and shoot at least 1 m (3.3 feet) away from your subject.Angle of View (APS-C):83°-23°

3.9

Reviews: 20

5 stars

40%

4 stars

30%

3 stars

15%

2 stars

10%

1 star

Christopher Evensen

06/25/2019

Next to zero image quality difference between this and the Sony 18-105mm. I bought both to see how much better the Zeiss would be and was shocked to find it VERY hard to determine which lens took which picture. At twice the price (theyre asking 1k for this thing now!), you get less zoom and no discernible image quality improvement. I returned this and kept the 18-105 Sony G series. For 500 bucks on amazon warehouse deals, it is a way better value than this zeiss.

K.Z.

06/25/2019

I tried 2 copies from Amazon, and end up returning both. I tested both with a test chart under the same light condition using manual mode. 1 copy have soft corners all around, the other one is much sharper, but I found a big piece of dust sit inside the lens dead-center. However, both copies seem to have a slight sharper left side image than right side. For a $900 Lens, which is not weather sealed, having such variation from copy to copy is simply not acceptable.