Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED Vibration Reduction Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLR Cameras

Comment

I purchased this lens from Amazon to go with my D7200. I have mostly been an FX user the last 4 years and currently also own a D750 and D800. My interest in going back to the DX camera and lenses started with using the D7200 as a way to get extra reach for my telephoto lenses such as the Nikkor 80-400mm VR and the newest Nikkor 300mmF4 VR. I was enjoying how well the D7200 worked with these lenses but I no longer had any wide angle "walk around lens" to use with this camera. I did have the Nikkor 24-120mmF4 VR and the 24-85mmF3.5/5.6 VR but those lenses are best suited for the FX format. I purchased the 16-80mmF2.8/4 VR on a whim. Having previously owned the 16-85 version, I hoped that this lens would have the improvements necessary to make it a "keeper". After a few days of testing and comparisons, I must admit that I will definitely keep this lens! My first test was to compare the 16-80 on my D7200 to the 24-120 on my D750. This is an easy test to do as the equivalent zoom ranges and apertures are the same (except for the ability of the 16-80 to go to F2.8). The result of this test amazed me. The 16-80 was sharper at all apertures from F4 through F16. It did not matter what focal length I was at. In addition, the 16-80 was better at contrast. Dark areas were darker, yet had more detail. A side benefit was the lack of any vignetting when a filter was attached to the 16-80 lens. This is not the case with the 24-120, when at 24mm focal length. I then compared the 16-80 (set to 34mm on my D7200) with the Nikkor 50mF1.8 mounted on my D750. Again, I was surprised that the 16-80 actually looked better at all apertures but F4, where the 50mm was slightly better in the extreme corners. Again, contrast was noticeably better on the 16-80. This was the first time any lens I owned outperformed this 50mm prime. I also own the Nikkor 20mmF1.8. Testing this lens directly with the 16-80 on my D7200 did show the superior performance of the 20mm lens, but the differences went away by F8. Both these lenses show the excellent contrast that comes with Nikons latest coatings. The Nikkor 16-80mmF2.8/4 VR is slightly lighter than the 16-85 but otherwise about the same size. The focus speed seems similar to the 24-120, and the VR seems to work as advertised. At 80mm, I compared the 16-80 to my Nikkor 70-200F4 VR. The first test was done with the 16-80 on the D7200 (set for 80mm) and the 70-200 on the D750 (set to 120mm). The result of this test was almost a dead heat with maybe a slight edge to the 70-200. I did a second test where both lenses were mounted on the D7200 (at 80mm). In this test the 70-200 clearly won. This is not surprising in that the FX format puts real demands on the corner performance of FX lenses whereas the DX format does not. in addition, the D750 has an anti-alias filter. The D7200 does not, allowing for better overall resolution if the lens can pull it off.(and the 70-200 certainly can!) I would go on a hike with the 16-80 on a D7200 and feel confident that I would get as good or better photos than if I carried the 24-120 with the D750. In low light, or the need to have limited DOF, I might want the FX combo, but for most scenery shots, I want maximum DOF and high ISOs are generally not needed. Do remember that DX cameras have 1.5 times greater DOF than FX. This lens is pricey. If I could not afford it, I would be temped by the Sigma 17-70mmF2.8/4. It looks to have similar performance overall. The only caveat, is the distortion. At 16mm, this lens has lots of barrel distortion. Strangely, it goes away by 19mm and quickly becomes pincushion all the way to 80mm. Most zooms seem similar in this regard. Just beware that you will want to correct for this distortion if buildings or ocean etc. are predominant in your images. I have not really tested this lens wide open at F2.8. It looked really good, but I just dont go there much, as I am mostly doing scenery shots rather than people shots, where one often wants to isolate the subject from the background. I can tell you this. Looking through the viewfinder one notices that the image is bright! That is an advantage of 2.8F worth noting. All in all, it is great to see such lenses come onto the market. The latest 24mp sensors are very demanding. This lens will hold up to those kind of sensors.

Show more

Comment

I have this lens on my Nikon d 7100, and it performs beautifully. Most of my photos are of landscapes, interesting buildings, cities at night, nature (close up, not macro) and sunsets. Although I expected really nice performance from this lens, based on numerous reviews, I am astounded by the sharpness, contrast and wonderful VR. I previously owned the excellent Nikon 17-55 f2.8, but I like the extra reach of this new lens. If you are considering this lens, you might want to take a look at the Flickr group Nikon 16-80 for images. Ive also included a few here that I took recently.

Show more

Comment

I was looking for a walk around lens for my D7200 for an upcoming trip to Europe. After a lot of online research the only negative factor I cold find was the price so I pulled the trigger and took it out for a test las weekend. This lens is spectacular. Very sharp, handles great, fantastic color and pairs very well with the D7200. Im 35mm terms it gives a focal length of 24-120 which is perfect for travel photography and if you want a little extra reach you can use the 1.3 crop mode and get 160mm at 16 megapixels. Highly recommended.

Show more

Comment

Im absolutely thrilled with this lens. I recently shifted from a D90 with a Nikon 18-105 plus a Tokina 80-400 and a Nikon 35mm prime to a D500. I replaced my zoom lenses and retained the 35mm prime. To that, I added a Nikon 70-200 f/4 and Tokina 11-20 f/2.8. I was getting great results with the faster zoom and wide angle lenses but the midrange gap was annoying- especially when taking family photos or anything on-the-fly. I opted for the 16-80 as it was a stop faster than most zooms, it covered more than the typical kit midrange and it was seemingly meant for the D500. I have been super impressed with the contrast and clarity. I consistently get clear subjects with beautiful bokeh. This is easily my go-to lens. I just wish I had bought it as kitted with the D500!

Show more

Comment

I purchased this lens used to replace my Sigma 17-70mm f2.8/4. I received it promptly and it worked as if it were new. Unfortunately, it was much bulkier than I expected and was cumbersome on my Nikon D5500. Another concern was the obvious "barreling" at 16mm. I therefore returned the lens and went back to using my Sigma17-70. For a small camera like the D5500, I would recommend the Sigma over the Nikon lens. It is much more compact and takes excellent photos.

Show more

Comment

If you like dark corners (vignetting) this is the lens for you. I however do NOT like it and am not impressed with this lens at all. I thought this would be a good lens to add to my bag and it made sense financially with the lens I really want being out of reach price wise. I am a big Nikon fan. This is the first lens I have not liked. Its fast, but the more complicated the lighting, the more the problems with the lens are apparent. If you ar only shooting outdoors in perfect light youll never have a complaint. But for more difficult lighting I would not recommend this lens

Show more

Comment

I prefer prime lenses. I wanted a lens that I could keep on the camera that I always have with me. This zoom is the equivalent of a 24-120mm lens on an FX camera. The IQ is very acceptable for a compact zoom lens. I suggest that one should stay just shy of the limits of this lens on both the short and the long end. The hood is a PITA but be careful with a substitute hood as it is easy to vignette on the 16 end. IMO, this may be the best short zoom for an APSC Nikon camera. It is mounted on a D7500.

Show more

Comment

My 5th Nikon lens, blows the rest away. Fast operation, great VR, beautiful bokeh. Nothing negative to say about this lens. I bought this to replace my AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR, which I loved and always kept on the body, but sadly I dropped it and the auto-focus broke. I thought that (cheap) lens was better than all my others, including my expensive prime-lenses, and while the 18-55 is a great lens, there is no comparison to what I can make this 16-80 do. I waited a few months of use to really-review this AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR, and can only sum it up by saying: it is worth the investment.

Show more

Comment

I purchased this lens as Used-Very Good Condition...In comparison to my Nikon 10-20 mm wide-angle lens I purchased brand new, there is no difference in the quality condition of both lenses!! The price was one-half that of a new lens, so I am very pleased with my purchase! Am glad I didnt buy my Nikon D500 with the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED Vibration Reduction Zoom Lens as a pair. Saved hundreds of dollars! A very satisfied photographer! Thanks, Southtown Camera!!

Show more

Comment

Great lens and great low light capabilities. A little heavy, but thats good glass for you. Only lens I used for my entire honeymoon trip in Italy. Performed flawlessly in all conditions.

Show more