Victor
This is my first product review ever and I am only writing it to mark the likely end of my love-hate relationship with the Fuji-X APS-C system as a whole. I have been on and off user of the system since X-E1, also had X-E2, X100s, X-T2. I like tinkering with my gear and Fuji cameras are ideal for those who hate taking photos in full or semi-auto modes. But as a RAW shooter, I also had my struggles with colors and sharpening, with weak focusing has been another pain point until X-T2 and X-T3 came along. Anyway, here I am two days before my trip to LA, Death Valley and Joshua Tree National parks scrambling with what gear to take with me on the trip. Do I take X-T3 with couple of primes and tried and trusted Canon 5D IV with 16-35 and 70-200, which seems a lot of gear to lug around or should I complement my Fuji lens setup with 10-24 and leave Canon at home. I chose to buy this lens, rushed a one-day delivery and was eager to test it out prior to the trip. And what a lesson it was. It only took me dozen of shots from both Fuji and Canon of my wooded backyard to realize total superiority of Canon images. Then I asked myself - what am trying to gain by taking Fuji to a trip of a lifetime (not sure I will ever visit Death Valley again), fully expecting that images will be vastly inferior to the ones from Canon 5D IV? The only reasons I could come up with are size and weight, but the benefits are not that significant given that a battery grip is a must on X-T3. Sure, Fuji cameras excel in taking people pictures, street photography or in any situations where you would not want to draw attention by pulling intimidating DSLR and aiming a shot through the viewfinder. For me, the image quality is top priority and this is why this lens goes back and the rest of my Fuji gear will find new happy owners on Ebay.