Canon PowerShot SX260 HS 12.1 MP CMOS Digital Camera with 20x Image Stabilized Zoom 25mm Wide-Angle Lens and 1080p Full-HD Video (Black) (OLD MODEL)

Comment

I received my SX260 last Wednesday and have taken about 700 shots and a few quick 5 minute video. Without writing a novel, here are the high/low points of this unit. In addition to this unit, I also purchased a couple of aftermarket batteries (and after market A/C adapters for about $5.00 each) for about $5.00 each and the batteries work fine. With the battery (original and aftermarket) I was able to get over 300 shots (50% flash) with zooming and playback and the battery meter still showed about 25% charge remaining. Pros Zoom - very long for a subcompact camera 20x optical, total 81x combined (yes 81 times!) Image Stabilizer - Excellent (far superior than the DSC-HX9V); Even at 81x the picture did not come out of focus, but of course not as sharp. I think its still acceptable Scenes - A few scenes; I think the portrait, sepia, B/W works real well (the Portrait+ suppose to blur the picture a bit, but its not to my liking) It has a few effects (fish eye, toy, miniature) thats very effective and can be fun for creative shots. Auto Mode - was able to pick the correct type of scene almost all the time; it has an easy mode, and smart auto. Not sure why they have an easy mode, but the smart auto works great Size/Weight - very compact and weighs 8.2 oz. I would have prefer if the lens was flushed with the unit, but at 20x it may not have been possible Uniformity - the unit does not feel cheap, and beautifully curved; no sharp jagged corners Grip - the right side of the camera has a nice plastic strip for easier grip Controls - Dial extremely easy to use with one hand. The other buttons, if youre a previous Canon user, its a no brainer; the menu and setup are practically the same across all their models. Screen - 3 inch TFT LCD screen very beautiful; nuff said Processor - Didnt notice that much difference between the DIGIC 4/DIGIC 5, but compared to the DSC-HX9V, this camera is like a Ferrari. GPS - Camera has it, but I never used it and probably wont; at least for the time being. Am more interested in a camera that takes excellent picture Cons Video - compared to the Sony DSC-HX9V this Canon comes in a distant second; if you plan on using this primarily as a video recorder, look elsewhere. I think Sony has excellent lens on their camera but their processing technology is clumsy, painfully slow and unacceptable; whereas with taking videos, the Sony does not do any processing (not to mention it captures at 60fps compared to Canons 24/25 fps) This is one thing I will miss dearly. Flash - not sure if there is a good place but I had to change my grip as the flash is on the top left corner. Couple of times, I had my left index finger on the flash and the camera gave some flash error message and had to power off and power on the camera to reset the flash. If youre a casual or intermittent photographer (or a professional wanting an everyday point and shoot camera without carrying a luggage everywhere) that is interested in looking for a well refined point and shoot camera, yet has manual controls usually found on higher end DSLR (or higher end point and shoot camera), this is it! UPDATE 04/14/2012 - I paid $349 and today I noticed its selling for $299, a 15% price drop in less than a month! I thought cars depreciate quick ... UPDATE 04/18/2012 - The Live Mode works great! For those hard shots (for example, taking indoor picture with fluorescent lighting and without a flash), you can view the screen and make the adjustment right then and there. You look at what you plan to take, compare it to the SX260 LCD screen and press the shutter button.

Show more

Comment

I am an experienced amateur photographer and Ive owned many cameras over the past 40 years. Ive had some photos published but photography has always been strictly a hobby, though a serious one. I shoot with a Canon 7D, Rebel backup, various L lenses, and I also use an Olympus E-P1 occasionally as well as a Canon S90 and Powershot 1100S (kept in my glovebox for emergencies). I enjoy taking pictures. I also enjoy traveling and have traveled around the states as well as visited many foreign countries. Im sure I echo the frustrations of every photographer out there when I say that choosing which photo equipment to take on a vacation is the most agonizing process in planning a trip. Let me share two experiences--one pleasant, another frustrating. In 2003, I visited New Zealand and took one of Canons first digital Powershots. It was very small, fit in my pocket, and I could easily whip it out for quick photos. Even though the pictures were not pristine SLR quality, it was easy and fun using that camera and I still enjoy viewing those photos today. I had a pleasant and memorable trip. Second experience: a 10-day tour of China in 2007. I took a DSLR and 3 lenses as well as an HD camcorder, all in the same shoulder bag. It turned out to be total frustration. Instead of being able to enjoy the moment of seeing all that glorious ancient history and the people of China, I was overly concerned with getting the shot -- all the time. Also, HD video was new in those days and I thought I could record the trip of a lifetime with the latest technology. But switching between video and still photography simply added to my frustration. Although I got quite a few good pictures and videos, I did not enjoy that trip as much as I should have because I let my photo-taking desires get in the way of my vacation needs and cultural immersion. As a matter of fact, my wife used a point-and-shoot to get some great candid photos of people and children that totally outshone my efforts. OK, fast forward to 2012. Like so many other photographers out there, when traveling I need a camera thats pocketable but can do everything. Impossible. It doesnt exist. But I remember the lessons learned from the experiences described above. Concessions must be made. With experience, Ive learned what is a necessity, and what would be nice to have when traveling. I have concluded that for me, a camera that takes very good pictures, that is small and lightweight, is a NECESSITY. Anything else would be nice to have but is not worth the enormous hassle. Ive had the Powershot SX260 HS for about a week now and I think I may have found the camera that will adequately meet my travel needs. Ive shot a couple hundred photos and Im surprised at the results. They are sharp, contrasty, colorful, noiseless, and good enough to use as desktop pictures on my 24-inch monitor without editing. The 20x lens is coupled to a shake-free technology that is very, very good. Its pocketable and has easy to use buttons that are logically placed. Canon has done their homework in finding the right balance between sharpness and noise, as far as I am concerned. Although it doesnt shoot RAW (thats a debate for another time), I am very happy with the JPEGs and I use the included highlight-taming technology built in to the camera and it works very well. What I like: 1) Pocketable. Pocketable. Did I say pocketable? 2) Turns on quickly to get the shot. 3) 20x lens -- 25mm to 500mm. The 25mm shots are corrected internally for distortion and the 500mm shots are sharp thanks to the IS technology. 4) Very good noise control -- I havent tested it at 1600 or 3200 but several other review sites reveal surprising, low noise photos at those ISO levels. 5) My copy is very sharp -- no need to sharpen the photos it produces. 6) Color accuracy is on par with my Olympus E-P1, which I consider to be the paragon of color accuracy. 7) Full manual when desired. 8) Takes very good HD video -- though that doesnt interest me so much these days. IS corrects for camera shake in video mode and zooming works well. What I dont like: Nothing yet, though I will update this review if anything comes up. Does this camera take pictures comparable to my 7D? No. My E-P1? Very close. My S90? Superior to the S90 in my view. The 20x zooming feature of this camera cant be overstated -- its wonderful. So many reviewers nitpick about technical matters. Sure, I could do that with any camera, including this one. But the point is--what need does the camera serve? All I know is this: If this camera had existed at the time, the SX260 would be the camera I would have taken to China. Highly recommended. [UPDATE: Many people have asked me about the so-called squeal in video mode. When ambient sounds are low, the condenser mic (as in all cameras) boosts the gain. Most cameras will then pick up the internal motor/electronic sounds. This camera is no exception. The noise Ive noticed is a very subtle high pitched ring similar to tinnitus. Am I surprised? No. Its the same sound Ive heard in every video unit Ive owned in the past 25 years. Medium to loud sounds will cause the mic to adjust and the tinnitus disappears. Folks, if video is important, buy a dedicated video camera. This is a PHOTO camera that has video capability, which is what I wanted.]

Show more

Comment

I couldnt decide between these three cameras (and their variants, the Sony HX30 and the Panasonic ZX20) because many of the reviews of each made the cameras sound very similar. So, I went out and bought (from merchants who accepted returns) one of each of these three cameras (I didnt need WI-FI or GPS, so thats how I settled on these less expensive variants). And then I took photos and videos in various conditions. I am not a professional photographer, and I didnt do Imatest or any other specific tests on the images (you can read C/net for that), but this is an experience of a regular person who was taking pictures and videos with these three cameras side by side, which is a comparison that you do not often see. The bottom line is that these three cameras are very similar with a few minor differences, but those differences set them apart and may make you decide that you like one more than the other. Generally speaking, NONE of these cameras is a DSLR replacement. Whomever writes that the pictures are as good as a DSLR is not speaking accurately. Also, none of the cameras is a replacement for a high end camcorder. OUTSIDE PICTURES If you are taking pictures outside on a sunny day all of these cameras will take very nice pictures for small to medium enlargements (no bigger than 8 x 10). The cameras all produce nice fairly sharp images that would be well suited for that purpose. And, like most people, I dont remember ever enlarging a picture more than 8 x 10, so it is not a common problem. What might be an issue is if you are zoomed in all the way and wanted to crop a photo (which sometimes happens), the differences in the way the cameras photos look when you "pixel peep" might make a difference. In good light outside, the cameras were close, but the best photos were from the CANON with the SONY and the PANASONIC a close second. INSIDE PICTURES - GOOD LIGHT If you are inside and you are taking pictures in low light, you will see a different story. Again, at smaller sized prints 4x6, 5x7, most people will see almost no difference between the pictures of the three cameras other than the PANASONICs colors are a little less vibrant than those in the CANON and the SONY. I am not sure whether those colors are less accurate, they are just a little less vivid. If you pixel peep at these pictures, the CANONs photos are clearly the best with the PANASONICs being second. The CANONs remain very sharp through a good amount of enlargement while the PANASONICs, although close, get softer a little faster. The SONYs pictures inside with good light became soft rather quickly and, Im not sure if this is because the SONY has 18MP on a small chip (as some of the tech reviewers write), but there is a "watercolor" effect where after you enlarge it a little bit, it looks like a Claude Manet painting. INSIDE PICTURES - LOW LIGHT In poor light, the hierarchy between the cameras remains the same, but there is less of a gap between the CANON and the PANASONIC. It seems as if the CANON takes somewhat worse pictures in low light, and the PANASONIC just doesnt get that much worse. As a result, the gap between these two becomes somewhat closer. The SONYs pictures remain the poorest of the three in low light. VIDEO - OUTSIDE GOOD LIGHT All three cameras take very nice video outside in good light. If you are editing or nitpicky, you will note that the SONY and the PANASONIC take 60 frames per second, which is somewhat easier to edit, than the 24 frames per second that the CANON records. While you have to look for it, the CANONs outside video does have a couple of instances where it seems to be a tad jerky compared to the SONY and PANASONICs video. But you really have to look for it and most people wont notice if you dont have another video outside for comparison. While all the outdoor video is close, I would give the edge to the SONY in video, with the PANASONIC second and the CANON third. But they are close for outside video. VIDEO - INSIDE Taking video inside is a different story. Inside, the SONY shines and clearly has the best video. The video from this camera is actually good. It is not professional level by any stretch, but it is good solid quite viewable video from a camera that takes still pictures. There is a noticeable difference on indoor video between the SONY and the PANASONIC. This difference was perhaps most noticeable to me because I had both videos from both cameras and watched them over and over again looking for differences. While the difference is noticeable, it is not a tremendous difference. The SONY video is super smooth and seems to get as much out of the light as it can. The PANASONIC video also is smooth and gets a good contrast tone and color out of the available light, but is slightly less smooth than the SONY. The PANASONIC video is still very viewable and looks good, but not as good as the SONY. The CANON will take decent indoor video in good light, but in poor light, it just seems to struggle. The CANONs video had many shadows and dark areas that simply were not present in the SONY and PANASONIC videos. I did not notice any hissing in the CANON video as some of the other reviewers have mentioned. This may be an issue that varies from camera to camera. HANDLING AND SPEED This was a fairly subjective comparison between the three cameras as to how they felt in the hand and how quickly the camera did what I wanted it to do because if the camera doesnt take the shot when you want to, it doesnt really matter how sharp the picture or video might be. Based on my experience, the PANASONIC had the best handling of the three. While the PANASONIC and the SONY were both quick to take a picture, for some reason the SONY that I had would take a much longer time (seconds) to record the picture onto the card. This was despite the fact that both cameras had comparable cards with comparable write speeds. Both the SONY and the PANASONIC had rather quick autofocus which also made them seem to react faster. The PANASONIC is noticeably thinner and lighter than the SONY while maintaining a similar full raised rubber grip on the front which made the camera easier to handle. While both the SONY and the PANASONIC were quick, the blazingly fast (by comparison) write speeds on the PANASONIC compared with its almost non-existent shutter lag made this the best handling camera of the three by far. Even though it consistently took the best pictures, the CANON was the worst handling camera. The autofocus often had issues focusing and there was a constant shutter lag while it was searching for its focus. We did miss some shots because the CANON was so slow to react. Also, the CANON is somewhere in weight between the SONY and the PANASONIC, but has the worst grip of the three. That little rubber strip on the front is not as effective a grip as the fuller grip that appears on the SONY and the PANASONIC. With respect to handling, Ive read many reviews and each of them seems to state different things about each of the cameras. Many of these reviews seem to indicate that the SONY is a very fast camera, and that might be the case, but the write speed of the 18 MP pictures (which are 50% larger than the CANONs photos and almost the same for the PANASONIC) was so slow, it was distracting and detracted from the experience of using the camera. VERDICT AND CONCLUSIONS None of these cameras is the best at everything. The CANON has the best pictures, but is slow to focus, somewhat awkward to handle and has the worst video of the three. The SONY handles okay but is heavy and has noticeably slow write speeds, its picture quality varies greatly with the light (and will deteriorate rapidly with any significant cropping) but the SONY has the best video, and it is noticeable. In the end I decided to go with the PANASONIC. While it only was the best in handling, to me that was a significant portion of the photographic experience. It is not DSLR fast (instantaneous), but it is a zippy camera for a superzoom, is light in weight and has a good grip which makes it easier to hold. Also, it does not have a pop-up flash which I found always seemed to come up under my fingers where I was holding the left side camera. As noted above, the PANASONICs videos were good, perhaps not as good as the SONY, but the PANASONIC was certainly capable of capturing some nice video, even in low light. The photos also were not as good as the CANONs, but they were close and very close in low light. With respect to the vibrancy of the colors, if you set the photo vibrancy on the PANASONIC to "happy" (which I guess is their "vivid") it is less of a noticeable difference. The photos look very nice and certainly are competitive in quality for this type of camera. Hopefully this comparison and these observations will help you decide between these three similar cameras so you can choose the best one for your needs. Good luck.

Show more

Comment

I have been traveling with this camera for over 3 years now. I do love my camera, so I rated it 5 stars but I do have issues with it as well. I have actually had to order two of these in the last 3 years, because the shutter broke on the first one. I did not have time to wait to get the shutter fixed, and all the quotes I received (to repair the shutter) were about 70% the total cost of a new camera. For a little more money I just purchased a new one. The first camera lasted one year before the shutter broke. I have had the second camera I purchased for two years now and I estimate that I have taken well over 30,000 photos with the camera and it is holding up great this time (so far). My other pet peeve with this camera is it is somewhat impossible to get a clear photo when the subject is in motion; that can be a huge issue if you are primarily using this to capture images of children, pets, and/or animals that are on the move. I have gotten fabulous photos of animals but they were still when I captured the moment. The photos come out beautiful and I have gotten so many compliments on the photos I have taken with this camera. I have been asked dozens of times what camera I am using because people love the photo quality so much. One of my favorite things about the camera is the super zoom. It is definitely possible to get DSLR quality with this convenient little point and shoot! ;) There are plenty of reviews on here going over technical specs, so without repeating information that is already available, I will include some photos I have taken with this camera. After all, a picture is worth a thousand words....

Show more

Comment

I purchased this camera a full month before it was released on Amazon for an upcoming trip to southeast asia. As luck would have it, it arrived the day before my flight took off. Ive had good luck with Canon cameras in the past and their picture quality is among the best. The SX260 caught my interest mainly because of the 20x zoom. There are already a couple of reviews going into detail about all of the features so I wont be redundant. Just let me say that there are more features than you will probably use. I will play around with the myriad of shooting modes from time to time, but mostly I will do 99% of my shooting in P mode, tweaking settings as I desire on the fly. I love the GPS feature; I will keep it permanently on so that all of my pics are geo-tagged. The Canon imagebrowser software that comes with the camera will show you the exact location on Google earth where the pic was taken. Pretty cool! I used the movie digest feature during my trip and like it very much. The camera will record three second snippets of video before each pic is taken then stitch them all together into one video. Again, pretty cool! The battery life was a major complaint on the previous model SX230. I did not have any battery life issues with this camera, but then again, I only take about 50 to 60 pictures in a day. I spent several days exploring the Khmer temples in Cambodia, taking my 50 to 60 pictures and at the end of the day the battery level indicator was at half. If you take a lot of pics then you may want an extra battery. With my shooting style, the battery life is fine. The picture quality is excellent. The somewhat slow lens gave me a little pause when I was making a purchasing decision, but it turns out that the CMOS sensor coupled with the HS system more than makes up for it. Turns out this camera is the best low-light performer I have had. I love the zoom. 20x optical plus 4x digital means a full 80x. I took a lot of pics at 80x during my trip and was pleased with the results. Even at 80x, the image stabilization was able to give me a clear pic in full sunlight. I found that I needed to steady myself in lower light to get a clear shot which is to be expected. The camera feels sturdy and has a nice "heft" for its size. I did drop it twice onto solid concrete (not like me at all) during my trip with no ill effects, thank God. So I guess it is solidly built inside as well. My only gripe with this camera is the very annoying location of the flash. It pops up where you naturally want to put your finger. Many times, my finger was in the way when it tried to pop up and it "jammed" causing an error message that said to turn the camera off and then back on. That always corrected it but I was afraid I would eventually cause it to break. I considered downgrading the rating to four stars because of this but eventually I trained myself to place my finger behind where the flash pops up and no longer do I have any issues with this.

Show more

Comment

First of all, let me tell you, this camera is AMAZING! Even though Im not a professional photographer, I love to take pictures of things (not food or my face doing some ugly poses like the "duck face", or any poses at all, Id rather take pictures of beautiful things, and I dont include myself on the definition of beautiful) and this camera performs incredibly well. Resolution is a "problem" because one can do only so much with 12.1 MP, I wish it had 20MP but oh well, my phone does and the pictures arent as clear as this cameras. The main advantage of this camera is the zoom, IT IS POWERFUL! Like the title says, if you have steady hands (sniper-level steady) you can zoom it to our beautiful moon and take some pictures. Its no NASA-grade equipment, but you can take beautiful pictures with it. The possibilities are limitless, and if it wasnt for the autofocus during the night "issue" I would succeed at photographing one passenger airplane while flying on other. (only didnt happen because I was in a red-eye flight.) However, I took a(nother) picture of the full moon in this same flight (picture 2 of the moon on during the day), so, a win for me anyways! Video quality is incredible, but you have to buy a super fast memory card, class 10 or UHS-I, to record videos smoothly and get as little delay as possible between pictures. This camera also have a rechargeable battery, so, its good that you dont have to deal with AAs every time you use it, and its bad because a replacement battery or a charger can cost you a lot. Also, you dont need to turn on the camera completely just to see some pictures. Just press the "play" button and there you go. For the final words of this review, a bit of warning: Dont hang around the beach too much with this camera. On windy beaches you can get sand in its lens easily, and that is a PAIN to clean. P.S. BOTH of the pictures were taken with this camera, one from the ground (night one), other inside an airplane (day one)

Show more

Comment

I was pretty skeptical buying another point and shoot. Have had a few and they just havent been great for much more that a macro photo or close candid pose. The test for this SX260 was a concert. The reason I wanted a point and shoot. I have an older canon model from 06 that takes pretty nice photos with a good zoom. It runs on AA batteries though and will not power on for longer than a few minutes. Alright. As far as this SX260 I am very pleased. I love the ability to control your scene much like the DSLR cameras. This was a must when purchasing a point and shoot. Gives you the ability to take great photos in a concert situation. My position in the arena wasnt all that close to the artist. Yet the zoom worked perfectly! Unlike those of other POS cameras and even some of the best phones. I have not yet viewed the photos on the computer or printed them but judging from the display, they have wonderful color and detail. They do not seem grainy at all. I did notice a little feedback when recording videos. Not a huge deal to me. I am going to try to isolate and clean it up some with editing software. In some reviews this camera is said to be heavy. Maybe it is for a small POS. Especially sinve there are more advances, newer models have more plastic parts. I appreciate its construction and "weight". To me that says its built to last. For myself being used to holding a DSLR for hours at a time, it is by no means heavy. Although I have not yet had my mother who has severe RA use it. Overall, this seems like a wonderful camera. Sure, there are newer models that have a further reaching zoom. Some shoot with double its megapixels. It doesnt necessarily mean they are better. I have seen some terrible quality pictures come from some, so called, amazing models! There will always be something better. Newer. We are always advancing. I believe this camera stands the test of time. I will add photos to this review soon!

Show more

Comment

My photographer daughter says that the best camera to get is the one which you will have with you. This model is light and small enough to live in my purse. It offers many modes, from automatized hand-holding if you dont know what to do with the settings, to all sorts of user adjustable modes. Note, there are newer entries in this Canon SX line, so you probably want to consider them instead of this. The low-light performance means you can go into dark museums or cathedrals and take wonderful photos without needing to use the flash, so it greatly extends the usability of this camera. And the zoom is a lot of fun, but at the highest power, stability is a problem when being hand-held, it is better if you can brace it against something, or use something like a Joby GorillaPod. My daughter recommended getting two extra batteries, and the largest possible memory card, so I did, and was greatly appreciative of that, because during excursions or travel to interesting places, I have used up to 3 batteries a day. However, for routine use of this camera when I am not traveling, a battery charge lasts several weeks of random photos. Regarding memory cards, when you are traveling, if you run out of memory, the places that sell to tourists usually have only small capacity ones, so it is better to get plenty of memory before you leave. My 64GB was adequate to hold a year of photos, included 2.5 weeks travel during which took a few thousand photos. Of course better cameras can be purchased for higher photograpic quality. Even though my daughter uses better cameras, her Canon SX is something she still regularly uses, along with the hacks that you can install on the memory card to increase the functionality of this camera with CHDK (Canon Hack Developer Kit), such as motion triggered photos, etc. If you want to see examples of photos taken with this (or any) camera, look on Flickr, where you can search for photos by camera used. Costco had this same model in black with a nice accessory package, but I liked the color of this one so much that I got it from Amazon. (No one else will ever get their small camera mixed up with mine.)

Show more

Comment

ALL OF THE 5 STARS REVIEWS HAVE TOLD EVERYTHING ALREADY. It took me months to research and find the perfect camera, and this was the winner. Luckily It was even more better than what I was expecting. This was what I wanted: -A camera than took pictures closely to the quality to a professional, without being one! -Good night picture quality, no grainy or blurry pictures. -Long and quality Zoom! -Colorful pictures (without needing to edit the color each time) -Quality focal pictures ...... I got even more than this! youll be amazed with the quality of all pictures, specially the night ones.Its hard to find a digital camera than takes pictures this good at night! Even caught ups fireworks, glow stick , Christmas trees amazingly well! (look at my tree in the customers pictures). The zoom is my other favorite! you can be in the last seat, way up in a huge stadium at a concert, and still get a really sharp and super close up to you favorite artist!.. ill definitely recommend this camera to anyone. Is the best small digital camera Ive own up to this point. The cons: Just like many 4 stars say.. the flash location!BE AWARE OF THIS.. I WAS AWARE BEFORE BUYING IT, SINCE A LOT OF REVIEW TELL THIS. Everyone will definitely have a problem with the flash location, In my case I dont really care because Ive gotten used to putting my finger somewhere else while taking a picture, but it does bother when you give it to somewhere else and they put the finger in there and the flash wont come up. You just ALWAYS have to remember to tell them not do that before taking it, or just like I do it, I quickly turn on the camera & randomly take a picture (to the floor, anywhere) before giving the camera to someone and the flash will stay out for a while for the next picture (or until you turn it off). People will see the flash is there and that makes them not to touch it. I cant really give this camera 4 stars just because of this, because In my opinion all of the amazing pros that it has are worth it! If they ever make the a newer model with the flash in the middle, or somewhere it will absolutely be 100% perfect. For now ill give it a 99% :)

Show more

Comment

Canon SX260 HS: Im happy to say that I was one of the first people to buy this camera. I bought it from one of the sellers on Amazon Marketplace, before it was officially released (it wasnt even available on amazon.com itself when I bought it). Its a good camera & quality clear pictures, with a clear & sharp LCD screen. The camera has the option of changing the aspect ratio for the pictures; you could choose from 16:9, 4:3, 3:2 & 1:1. You could also change the amount of recording pixels from L, M1, M2 & S. In auto mode, it has many predefined scenes. The camera could also be set to various scene modes, including portrait, Smooth skin, smart shutter, High-speed Burst HQ, Handheld night scene, low light, underwater, snow, fireworks, discreet & stitch assist. It does not have the scene modes for Kids & pets, foliage or beach, which other Canon powershot cameras have, but I dont think that would make a big difference, as it takes great pictures anyway. It also has creative filters which I havent yet used, including fish-eye effect, miniature effect, toy camera effect, soft focus, monochrome, super vivid, poster effect, color accent & color swap. It has the movie digest feature & face ID. It also features continuous shooting. In manual mode, there are many different options, including setting the ISO speed (speeds available: 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 & 3200), flash output, changing the compression between fine & superfine (superfine is not available in Auto mode, but is available in P mode), white balance (settings available: auto, daylight, cloudy, tungsten, fluorescent, fluorescent H, underwater & custom), my colors (including: vivid, neutral, sepia, B/W, film, lighter & darker skin tone, vivid blue, vivid green, vivid red & custom) & light metering. Manual mode has the option to have the flash forced on (forced flash is not available in auto mode, but is available in P mode). You can also set the shutter speed anywhere between 1/3200 of a second & 15 seconds (with speeds slower than 1.3 seconds, ISO speed is set at 100). Aperture value could be set anywhere between f/3.5 & f/8.0, but it also depends on the zoom position (with maximum zoom, aperture value could be set either at f/6.8 or at f/8.0). There is also a P mode, where various functions can be set. (Many of the options available in manaual mode are available in P mode also, including forced flash). Im not here to describe every detail of the camera, as there are many more functions available as well (including setting the focus & exposure, plus some more that I havent yet figured out), but for those that would like to know everything prior to buying the camera, they could go to Canons website - [...] (find the camera, click on brochures & manuals) & download the complete user guide. Movies: Good quality with very clear sound. Optical zoom could be used for movies (& the sound of the zoom during the movie is extremely faint, not like some of the previous canon powershots). Options available are: Full HD (1920 x 1080, 24 fps), HD (1280 x 720, 30 fps) & VGA (640 x 480, 30 fps). Maximum clip length is approx 30 minutes for Full HD & HD, & approx an hour for VGA (or until the memory card is full). Movie format is .MOV. It also has iFrame (1280 x 720), & super slow motion (640 x 480, 120 fps, or 320 x 240, 240 fps). Please note since the primary function of this camera is for stills (as this is not a camcorder), therefore when you shoot a movie, it uses quite a lot of memory & the files will be very big. On an 8GB memory card: Full HD will be approx 30 minutes, HD - approx 42 minutes & VGA - approx 1 hour & 28 minutes, whereas on a camcorder, for the same amount of memory, the shooting time could be much longer, even in HD. But for shooting small clips here & there, its very good. Zoom: zoom is very good - 20x zoom. It zooms quickly. Wide angle is 25mm which is very good & for some pictures you might want to zoom in a bit; otherwise it might be a bit too wide. In full maximum zoom, you may want to use a tripod; otherwise it might take some time to focus (but you could get good pictures even without a tripod). I found that in full maximum zoom (indoors), auto mode might not get the right ISO speeds etc. & you might need to use some manual settings, but that shouldnt be a big problem (plus you dont have to always use the full maximum zoom). Playback: It has some cool features for playback, including giving you various transitions between pictures (fade, slide or scroll), or watch them in a slide show on the camera. Erasing pictures is very easy; you do not need to go into the menu to erase pictures. You could also organize pictures in categories, or set-up a photo book. It has red-eye correction in shooting mode & in playback. You can also trim pictures or resize them in playback. Camera body: I find that the camera is very solid; the door for the memory card & battery compartment is sturdy, though the cover for the (AV & HDMI) terminals is flexible. The tripod socket is metal. The feel of the camera is smooth & it has a rubber grip on the front. In the USA, this camera is available in three colors; black, red & green. In other countries its also available in dark silver; I dont know why this color is not available in the US. GPS: I have not yet used the GPS, so I cant give any info on that. In other countries, Canon also makes the "Powershot SX240 HS". The difference between the SX240 & the SX260 is that the SX240 does not have the GPS feature, whereas the SX260 has the GPS feature. The SX240 HS is not available in the USA. Flash: The flash is a pop-up flash. Some people might think this is not convenient. However its ok & its more convenient than the previous model, the SX230 HS. In the SX230, the flash takes up the entire depth of the camera; therefore theres almost nowhere to place your left finger. In this model however, the flash only takes up half the depth of the camera, enabling one to place their left finger behind the flash. The flash does not pop up automatically every time you turn on the camera. It pops up (in Auto-flash) when it determines that it needs to use the flash, or when you set the flash to (forced) on. If your finger is stopping the flash from popping up properly, it might tell you to power-off the camera & then to power-on, in order to be able to pop-up completely. After a while of using the camera, you should get used to the pop-up flash. Software: I have not yet used the software on my computer, so I cant say anything about it. But you can still connect the camera to a computer (via the USB cable) even without installing the software. Included in the box are: The camera SX260 HS, Battery NB-6L, Battery charger CB-2LY, Wrist Strap WS-DC11, USB Interface Cable IFC-400PCU & the Digital Camera Solution CD-ROM. The camera comes with a printed version of the "Getting Started" guide. The complete "User Guide" is to be found on the disk that comes with the camera (together with the software), or it could be downloaded from[...] . If you would like to get product updates from canon, you could register your camera on usa.canon.com . For those who are aware of differences in other Canon models between being made in Japan or in China, the camera that I purchased was made in Japan, & the battery & battery charger were made in China. Memory Card: The memory card of a camera is like the processor of a computer. The faster the memory card, the faster the camera. Canon recommends a "Class 6 or Higher Memory Card". I got the SanDisk Ultra Class 10 Memory Card 16GB Sandisk SDSDU-016G-A11 16GB Ultra SDHC UHS-I Card 30MB/s (Class 10) . Its also available in 32GB & 64GB (The 64GB is SDXC, not SDHC). Please note: if your memory card is SDHC or SDXC, make sure you have a card reader that could read those types of cards, as some card readers only read SD cards, but not SDHC & SDXC (or it might not support a certain class speed). (You might be interested in the SanDisk USB 3.0 card reader that I purchased SanDisk ImageMate All-in-One USB 3.0 Flash Memory Card Reader (SDDR289A20) ). But even if you dont have such a reader, you can still connect the camera to a computer via the USB cable (even without installing the software). Camera Case: Personally I prefer a case with a flap opening (as opposed to a zipper opening) together with a shoulder strap. The Canon cases do not have a shoulder strap. For my previous model, I had the Lowepro rezo 10. For the size of this camera, the Lowepro cases that were big enough have zipper openings. So I searched for a case. Eventually I came across the Tamrac cases. First I tried the Tamrac 3819 Case, but it was extremely tight. So I got the next size - the Tamrac 3821 Tamrac 3821 Neos Digital 21 Camera Bag (Black) , & it fits perfectly. (Its available in 4 colors; black, red, green & rust). It has a Velcro opening, small pocket (but make sure nothing falls out) a belt loop & an extendable shoulder strap.

Show more